Moses’ brother, Aaron, became the first chief priest of the Hebrews about 1300 B.C. Priests of Egypt are supposed to have told Solon during his ten years in Egypt (about 600 B.C.) that 9,000 years before that time there was a cataclysm which buried Atlantis beneath the ocean. If Moses did write part of the Old Testament, he then must have had Naga tablet writings, or Egyptian interpretations of them, handed down to the Egyptians for thousands of years and the Egyptian priesthood had knowledge of a cataclysm 11,500 years ago. Certainly the Ten Commandments were a condensation of the forty-two questions of Osiris for entering heaven. This seems not too far-fetched, since Moses was reared in the Egyptian tradition, in a royal household, and probably had access to many religious writings and teachings now lost with the passing of the archives of Egypt, in Alexandria, Heliopolis, and Sais. There are many schools of thought on this subject, but the most predominant one is that Moses was the originator. Certainly their knowledge of prehistoric languages could be a key, and later We’ll discuss the role of Naga and Ancient Mayan in the story of Adam and Eve first, however, let’s examine the history of Genesis I, II, and III. If we look to men such as Don Antonio Batres Juarequi and James Churchward, we may have our answer. If the story did originate with that tumble, in what language was it first written? Certainly not Hebrew or Greek, for as far as we know, they didn’t exist at that time. This, then could be approximately the time of the Adam and Eve story. If it were so, then it would be the tumble preceding Noah’s (another fascinating story!), about 11,500 years ago. Well, now! This was worth thinking about. On rereading it, I had to agree Genesis II even mentions that a mist, or flood, went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground. Years of data correlation in studying the earth tumbling concept has shown the last tumble to have occurred about 6500 years ago that Noah, or Utnapishtim, or whatever his name was, did exist and did survive that particular cataclysm.Ī friend of mine suggested that Genesis I is almost a perfect description of conditions on our planet immediately following a tumble. If the story were taught as the truth so uniformly, in spite of its apparent divergence from scientific truths, then to me the true course would seem to be a search for the foundation of the story, which would then lead to a true reading of it. Now, to me the answer was not simply one of two usual alternatives: either unquestioning faith in the story as it stands, or complete repudiation as utter nonsense. I’d like to talk about just one of these bugaboos.įrom the first time I heard the story of the creation and Adam and Eve, it “buzzed” me, as my young son would say. If I made a list of all these things in my life it might take up a whole book. Not big things, but little things, which don’t exactly persist, but annoyingly stick their head through your life’s door and say “Boo!” just to let you know they’re still there. It’s funny how some things can plague you from childhood through your adult years. This is probably the reason why the CIA classified The Adam and Eve Story in the first place. This explains why Thomas seldom provides citations for much of his information – Project Nanook remained classified when Adam and Eve Story was published in 1963 – he would have been prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act had he revealed his source. Many of the details in Adam and Eve are almost identical to what is to be found in Ken White’s book. Thomas seems to have sourced much of his information from having knowledge of Project Nanook (1947), which remained classified from 1947 until 1988, as described in World in Peril (1994). The original text has been available since publication. What sets it apart from most, if not all of its peers, is that the CIA at some point classified a work which was already in the public domain, and then released a sanitized version of it in 2013. Chan Thomas’ book, first published in 1963, is one of possibly hundreds which reference the topic of cataclysm theory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |